Complete floating point literals

[Daniel Murphy]

"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com> wrote in message 
news:ivcg7j$ooj$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Jacob Carlborg reminds that 1.f conflicts with the UFCS, I think the 
> suggestion by Daniel Murphy of the special case is not worth it.
>

If the only reason for removing 1.f and 1.L is to aid ufcs we should also 
get rid of leading underscores after the decimal point.  eg 1._3 also 
conflicts with ufcs.  And don't forget hex floating point literals.