Next in Review Queue: The New std.path

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:55:18 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

> On Friday 15 July 2011 04:38:35 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Since the details of many of these functions have changed, is it really
>> a good idea to make the depricated names aliases of the new functions?
>> If anyone has code that relies on the screwy old behavior (such as
>> trying to compensate for their problems) then that code will silently
>> break.
> 
> If the behavior has changed, then the old functions need to be there.
> Otherwise, code will silently break, which would be worse than just
> outright removing the functions.

I'll put them back in.

-Lars