std.path review: update

Vladimir Panteleev vladimir at thecybershadow.net
Mon Jul 18 08:28:13 PDT 2011


On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:07:12 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad  
<public at kyllingen.nospamnet> wrote:

> The fact that extension() currently *does* behave as Vladimir wants is,
> in my opinion, an implementation detail.

Is it still an implementation detail if it's documented behavior?

-- 
Best regards,
  Vladimir                            mailto:vladimir at thecybershadow.net


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list