GitHub or dsource?

[Nick Sabalausky]

"David Nadlinger" <see at klickverbot.at> wrote in message 
news:j068tj$4fv$1 at digitalmars.com...
> On 7/7/11 8:19 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> [.]But DSource is better for
>> forums and issue tracking. So I would just use both - code hosting at 
>> github
>> and forums/issue-tracking at dsource.
>
> I doubt that DSource is really the better option for issue tracking. 
> First, GitHub rolled out »Issues 2.0« a few months ago, which now has 
> support for assigning bugs, milestones, etc. I personally haven't used it 
> for a large project yet, but Ruby on Rails switched to it (they previously 
> used Lighthouse), so I suppose it is quite fit for the purpose.
>
> Second, at least for QtD, there is a massive problem with using the 
> DSource Trac instance: Spam. I don't know if this affects other projects 
> as well, and you might not actually notice it that much because we usually 
> hard-delete spammy tickets/changes via the admin panel, but it is 
> definitely annoying.
>

I might have been thinking of BitBucket. BitBucket's issue system is horrid.