std.log - What Happened?

[Jose Armando Garcia]

It is still around and ready for review. Unfortunately, I cannot
entertain a review process at the moment. Give me until the beginning
of August.

If you search for std.log and my name in the Phobos mailling list, you
should be able to find a link to the implementation and the druntime
chances. I would love to hear your opinion if get a chance to use it.

On Friday, July 22, 2011, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> On Friday 22 July 2011 01:19:40 Andrew Wiley wrote:
>> There was a lot of discussion about a few std.log proposals here a few
>> months back, and I was just wondering if someone had one they were planning
>> to put up for review in the near future.
>> I have a moderately sized codebase that needs a good logging module, and
>> rather than rolling one from scratch, I'd prefer to switch from the terrible
>> thing I'm using now to a not-so-stable API that someone wanted dogfooded
>> (dogfed?).
>
> It's ready for reviewe, but its implementor went on vacation for a month or
> so. Presumably, it'll get reviewed not terribly long after he gets back.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
>