Syntax changing
Monkol
dj_mon at mail.ru
Sun Jun 5 14:11:47 PDT 2011
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:36:42 +0300, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>
wrote:
> On 2011-06-02 13:56, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Monkol" <dj_mon at mail.ru> wrote in message
>> news:op.vwgs7ypjcqe400 at pc-2010.dnepr.net.ua...
>>
>> >i think it is necessary to change template syntax and do as C++ style
>> >template A <>, and not A !(), A <>. many people come from C++ and it
>> will
>> >be easy to adapt.
>>
>> I came from C++, and I found it easy to adapt. Plus, like it says in the
>> link Steve gave, there are technical downsides to using <>.
>
> LOL. I use C++ in my job, but I use templates in D so much more than I
> do in
> C++ that I now end up using !() instead of <> unless I catch myself. I
> actually ultimately much prefer !() - especially since you can reduce it
> to
> just ! when there's only one template argument and it doesn't have any
> periods
> in it.
>
> Though honestly, if a programmer can't get used to a slightly different
> syntax, then they're screwed anyway. Every language has its quirks and
> differences. Syntax is a very small part of all of that. Really, the
> syntax is
> the _easy_ part. It's the semantics where the real problems start as far
> as
> adapting to a new language goes.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
the statement to<float("123e2")> is more easy readable then
to!float("123e2") for example
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list