TempAlloc review starts now

[Jonathan M Davis]

On 2011-06-06 05:58, dsimcha wrote:
> On 6/6/2011 4:56 AM, simendsjo wrote:
> > 686: missing () (same as above)
> 
> Argh.  Can we **__PLEASE__** go with loose semantics for @property?

As far as I know, strict enforcement is still where we're going (and honestly, 
I really hope that it stays that way). But we already debated that quite a bit 
recently on the Phobos list, so you know essentially where that stands.

- Jonathan M Davis