TempAlloc review starts now
Robert Clipsham
robert at octarineparrot.com
Mon Jun 6 13:28:07 PDT 2011
On 06/06/2011 20:10, dsimcha wrote:
> Seems there's a strong consensus that the "newVoid" name sucks. I agree in
> hindsight. Will change.
If you made it a bit more generic, it could become uninitialized!().
// int a = void;
auto a = uninitialized!int;
// double[] a = newVoid!double(100);
auto a = uninitialized!(double[])(100);
// double[][] a = newVoid!(double[])(100, 100);
auto a = uninitialized!(double[][])(100, 100);
--
Robert
http://octarineparrot.com/
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list