core.sys/core.stdc vs. std.c?

[KennyTM~]

On Jun 12, 11 14:44, Daniel Gibson wrote:
> Am 12.06.2011 08:38, schrieb David Nadlinger:
>> core.stdc is the place for C standard library modules, core.sys.* are
>> where the C operating system header translations reside – this is our
>> current policy, right? If so (I can't actually remember any formal
>> decision or discussion), is there a reason we still have so much code in
>> std.c?
>>
>> David
>
> And why is core.stdc not listed on
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/phobos.html and
> http://d-programming-language.org/phobos/index.html ?
>
> Furthermore it'd be nice if the functions contained there were
> documented or at least listed.
>
> Cheers,
> - Daniel

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872