About foreach loops
Don
nospam at nospam.com
Fri Jun 17 00:57:44 PDT 2011
bearophile wrote:
> Don:
>
>> The alternative would be to create __iterator1234 as const, and then
>> cast away const in the ++ step. Ugly, but would eliminate the
>> performance cost for structs.
>
> Isn't it undefined in D to modify a const?
Yes, but that's in the user world. This is in the compiler world.
Lowering frequently creates constructs which aren't well-formed D code.
For example, the compiler creates variables in comma expressions, which
isn't legal D (it won't even compile).
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list