TempAlloc: an unusual request

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

I'd like to kindly request the author, the review manager, and the 
community that TempAlloc skips this round of reviews without inclusion 
in Phobos, to be reviewed again later.

The design of TempAlloc is plenty adequate for its charter, but the 
charter itself is too narrow. I'd like to design together with David a 
more general allocator interface in which TempAlloc would be a player. 
That requires massive changes to the interface, but relatively small 
changes to the implementation.

If we don't do this, TempAlloc would be an outlier once we have 
allocator, and would need to be adapted in order to mix and match with 
other allocation strategies.

Please let me know if that's a possibility and I'll get back with details.


Thanks,

Andrei