State of curl wrapper?

[Jonathan M Davis]

On 2011-06-21 20:44, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message
> news:mailman.1107.1308711970.14074.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
> 
> > Is the curl wrapper at about the point that we could look at doing a
> > formal
> > review of it followed by voting for inclusion in Phobos, or does it need
> > more
> > bake time? It's fine either way. I'd just like to know where it sits.
> > 
> > If it's ready for review, then we can start a formal review process for
> > it. If
> > not, then Andrei has a pull request which would create a std.benchmark
> > (though
> > a good chunk of it is from std.datetime) which some of expressed the
> > desire to
> > have formally reviewed rather than just reviewed on github. So, if the
> > curl
> > wrapper isn't ready for review yet, then we can review that.
> > 
> > So, is the curl wrapper about ready for formal review, or does it need
> > more
> > bake time first?
> 
> Or if not, what about the new std.path? I've been looking forward to that.
> 'Course, curl would certainly be good too (and probably more important).

No. Unfortunately, Lars is going on vacation for a couple of weeks (and he's 
the one whose been reworking std.path), so that's not going to work. And Jose 
is going to be gone for a month or so as well, so we can't review his 
implementation of std.log either. Otherwise, they'd be up for review.

At the moment, the only possibilities that I'm aware of are the curl wrapper 
and std.benchmark.

- Jonathan M Davis