Naming conventions for functions in similar modules

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 6/22/11 1:30 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 6/21/2011 10:38 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> For example, should we have
>>>> std.ascii.toLower and std.uni.toLower or std.ascii.toAsciiLower and
>>>> std.uni.toUniLower?
>
>
> I think we've failed if we have to name things std.ascii.toAsciiLower,
> i.e. having to repeat the module name in the function name in order to
> disambiguate it.

Same here.

Andrei