Mixin template evaluated to string can convert to string mixin expression implicitly

[Alex_Dovhal]

"Timon Gehr" <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:
> String mixins themselves are 'a little bit ugly' (but unquestionably very 
> useful).
> I think the syntax should keep reflecting that.
>
> Your proposal is a try to make up for Ds lack of macros. I'd prefer 
> macros.
> Also overloading the meaning of 'mixin template' seems to be questionable. 
> As I
> understand it, your proposal would make code like this valid?:
>


With Don's extension of CTFE and Kenji proposal it's possible to fully 
implement macroses in library. I've tried to do that earlier but it was 
impossible with current compiler state. I think it's GREAT idea. Thank Kenji 
for making it. I'm interested in implementing such macro library. Are there 
any instructions how to compile DMD under windows?