Scope of variables

[Peter Alexander]

On 25/06/11 2:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> That's why a lot of people typically use a different naming scheme for member
> variables (e.g. prepending them with _ or m_). As long as you're smart about
> naming, it's really not a problem.
>
>> I don't want that to be required though.
>
> Yeah. That would not be fun. As it is, there are a variety of ways that you
> can go about differentiating between globals, locals, and member variables.
> There's no need for the compiler or language to get into it any further than
> they already do. Being too strict about stuff like that would get very
> annoying.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

Agree with this 100%.

This is a solved problem. No need for throwing more and more language 
features at it.