Rename std.string.toStringz?

[Walter Bright]

On 6/25/2011 5:31 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> So, while the majority have indicated in the past renaming functions in Phobos
> to be properly camelcased is worth breaking code in the general case, there is
> no such consensus in this particular case, so toStringz is sticking around.

There's a large community using D that doesn't necessarily participate in ng 
discussions. I'd like to see more than a simple majority in order to rename 
existing functions (especially ones that have been around a while).

Breaking existing code really, really annoys people. It drives people away from 
using D as "unstable" - and they'd be right.

I don't think we can create a viable D community if we break existing code every 
month without really, really good reasons to.