State of std.json?

Jonathan M Davis jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Sun Jun 26 10:34:35 PDT 2011


On 2011-06-26 07:17, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 6/26/11 12:54 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > Well, AFAIK the only other thing which could be up for review at the
> > moment is std.benchmark, which arguably doesn't even need a review,
> > which is quite small (something like half of it coming from
> > std.datetime) and is definitely less important than getting a
> > pre-existing module revamped such as std.json. So, if you're nearly
> > ready to have the variant stuff reviewed, then I think that we should go
> > for it. If not, then we can look at std.benchmark first.
> 
> Since std.benchmark got promoted from small additions to full-fledged
> module, it needs a few improvements before the formal review. The most
> important is output in machine readable form such that you can see
> "before" and "after" comparisons.
> 
> I'm also thinking of a complementary tools/ script that fetches two
> given releases of Phobos (or the latest and the head), compares them,
> and outputs the deltas.
> 
> Unfortunately, I'm very busy for the time being and I don't see getting
> to this until at least two weeks from now.

Okay. Good to know. Life does get in the way sometimes. ;)

- Jonathan M Davis


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list