Is @property implementable?

Bekenn leaveme at alone.com
Wed Mar 2 20:17:48 PST 2011


On 3/2/2011 6:36 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Because a property must be a property _of_ something. It's essentially an
> abstraction of a member variable. It allows you to use a function as if it were
> a member variable. That's its whole purpose.

Very much agreed.

I'm not sure I'm familiar with UFCS; can you point me to some 
documentation/discussion on it?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list