LLVM 3.0 type system changes

Daniel Gibson metalcaedes at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 05:08:07 PST 2011


Am 08.03.2011 03:41, schrieb Caligo:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Bernard Helyer <b.helyer at gmail.com
> <mailto:b.helyer at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:03:36 +0000, filgood wrote:
>
>      > as described here:
>      >
>      > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt
>      >
>      > Btw, what is the status of the D2 LLVM compiler?
>
>     You're probably wondering about LDC2, but I'll chip in with SDC's
>     ( https://github.com/bhelyer/SDC ) status here:
>
>     On the road to some kind of 0.1, but a lot of work to be done -- it
>     should land some time this year, however.
>
>     Keeping current with DMD releases, current with LLVM releases.
>
>
>
>
> Do we really need another D compiler that doesn't work?

The more D compilers the better.
Assuming that it won't work is quite insulting IMHO.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list