LLVM 3.0 type system changes

[spir]

On 03/08/2011 02:08 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
> Am 08.03.2011 03:41, schrieb Caligo:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Bernard Helyer <b.helyer at gmail.com
>> <mailto:b.helyer at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:03:36 +0000, filgood wrote:
>>
>> > as described here:
>> >
>> > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt
>> >
>> > Btw, what is the status of the D2 LLVM compiler?
>>
>> You're probably wondering about LDC2, but I'll chip in with SDC's
>> ( https://github.com/bhelyer/SDC ) status here:
>>
>> On the road to some kind of 0.1, but a lot of work to be done -- it
>> should land some time this year, however.
>>
>> Keeping current with DMD releases, current with LLVM releases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Do we really need another D compiler that doesn't work?
>
> The more D compilers the better.
> Assuming that it won't work is quite insulting IMHO.

In addition, the fact it is in D is a huge advatange. D desperately needs a 
community lexer / parser / semantic analyser. Cannot be C++ stuff.

Denis
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com