Status report, milestones, quality improvements?

[Nick Sabalausky]

"foobar" <foo at bar.com> wrote in message 
news:ilpt40$17b7$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> "Caligo" <iteronvexor at gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:mailman.2533.1300256058.4748.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
>> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Nick Sabalausky <a at a.a> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "jasonw" <user at webmails.org> wrote in message
>> >> news:ilp2rt$1fs5$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > Newsgroup threads often discuss useless things (CRT displays and
>> >> > whether
>> >> > black-on-white is better than white-on-black in a feature proposal
>> >> > threads). Nick Sabalausky and Walter Bright are worst trolls in this
>> >> > regard, hijacking every thread to spread off-topic talk.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Hooray! The discussion nazis have arrived! Time to celebrate:
>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idBh1WMG8Vk Doo dee doot
>> >>
>> >> I've seen stupid shit in the internet, but people crying over what 
>> >> gets
>> >> discussed is by far the stupidest.
>> >>
>> >> Browncoats forever! Gorram reevers! Tribute? You steal men's souls and
>> >> make
>> >> them your slaves! I ate what? It's a laser, but in solid, not gaseous
>> >> form.
>> >> Hummana hummana hummana. Klaatu barada nikto. Yes, I was dead, but I'm
>> >> better now. Nibbled to death by cats. Colorful * happy * material * 
>> >> go!
>> >> Shinigami love apples. I will take a potato chip...AND EAT IT! Your
>> >> moosey
>> >> fate! Just don't go wrecking your automail! Autowash? Big boom, big
>> >> baaadaaa
>> >> boom! You better tell me who you are? You must have bananas in your 
>> >> ears!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > I think jasonw forgot to mention that you are also the biggest dickhead
>> > here.
>> >
>>
>> That's certainly true. After all, considering how I frequently call 
>> people
>> in here names like "dickhead", that quite likely does makes me the 
>> rudest,
>> most immature person here. You'd certainly never do such a childish 
>> thing,
>> would you?
>>
>>
>>
>
> While I disagree with the direct attacks and poor phrasing, there is a 
> point in what the OP says.
> People have the freedom to talk about whatever floats their boat but I do 
> hope that as a courtesy to others they would at least use a descriptive 
> subject line.
>

You know, even I can admit that's a fair point. It has been brought up 
before, and since then I've been trying to rename subject lines when 
appropriate. It's an easy thing to forget, though. And it doesn't generate 
any compiler messages!