review of std.parallelism

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:58:46 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> On 03/19/2011 04:25 PM, dsimcha wrote:
>> On 3/19/2011 4:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> I know you'd have no problem finding the right voice in this
>>> discussion if you only frame it in the right light. Again, people are
>>> trying to help (however awkwardly) and in no way is that ridiculous.
>>
>> Fair enough. Now that I think of it most of my frustration is that
>> these details are only getting looked at now, when I have a week (and
>> an otherwise very busy week) to fix all this stuff, when this module
>> has been officially in review for the past two weeks and unofficially
>> for several months. I would be much more open to this process if the
>> issues raised could be fixed at my leisure rather than on a hard and
>> tight deadline. This is exacerbated by the fact that I have another
>> important, unrelated deadline, also next Friday.
>>
>> At the same time, though, I'm afraid that if we didn't fix a vote date
>> and put some urgency into things, the pace of the reviews would be
>> glacial at best, like it was for the first two weeks of official review
>> and the months of unofficial review.
> 
> Exactly. I understand. Well here's a suggestion. How about we "git
> stash" this review? I recall another submission was vying for the queue
> so we can proceed with that while you have time to operate the changes
> you want. If not, we can simply wait 2-3 weeks and then have you
> resubmit for a shorter process (1-2 weeks) that would gather more
> feedback (hopefully minor that time) and votes.
> 
> Lars?

Sounds good.  I'll make the announcement.

-Lars