GCC 4.6

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Mon Mar 28 11:40:35 PDT 2011


On 3/28/2011 9:09 AM, Caligo wrote:
> I've been doing a lot of coding in D in the past few weeks, and one
> thing I've noticed is that performance is not great.  Surprisingly,
> DMD generated binaries perform worse than GDC's, but even GDC is
> lagging behind equivalent code written in C++ and compiled with G++.
> Are we to expect performance to improve as more work is done on GDC?

There is no technical reason why performance should be worse. It's a matter of 
investing the time and effort into the code generation.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list