Managing the review queue

[spir]

On 03/28/2011 09:32 PM, bearophile wrote:
> Walter:
>
>> I have thought in the past about putting such modules into another package, call
>> it "foo" for lack of a better name, and put it in the dmd distribution. If the
>> package pans out in real life, then move it to std. So, yes, I think your idea
>> is a good one.
>
> It's a nice idea. Possible names: "std.experimental", "std.unstable" or "std.minefield" :-)

std.experimental is better than std.foo, because 'foo' is far too useful as 
variable name ;-)

Denis
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com