Implementing std.log

[Jose Armando Garcia]

Yes. The current implementation doesn't support this because share
memory logging is not implement but in the future you should be able
to:

initializeLogging(ActorLogger.getCreator(args[0]));
// or...
initializeLogging(SharedLogger.getCreator(args[0]));

Where ActorLogger implements logging with message passing and
SharedLogger with a shared buffer. Maybe we can also provide an
implementation that assumes a single threading environment.

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Andrew Wiley <wiley.andrew.j at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:03 PM, dsimcha <dsimcha at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, there's clearly been some misunderstanding here.  My real point was,
>> why do you need this threading at all?
>
> It's definitely overkill for a single threaded application, but for things
> like the application I'm working on, which is multithreaded and already uses
> message passing between threads, I think it would fit in quite nicely.
> My question would be whether it's pluggable enough to allow the simple case
> of a single threaded program that doesn't need message passing to be
> implemented.