Implementing std.log

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 05/11/2011 08:46 AM, dsimcha wrote:
> On 5/9/2011 2:52 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> As I mentioned I'd already decided I'll take a stab at implementing a
>> logging module inspired in design from glog. I was tired of the endless
>> discussions on what a logging API should look like. This ironically is
>> leading now to an embarrassment of riches - we now have two proposals on
>> the table. I subjectively prefer mine for the simple reason that it
>> includes exactly what I wanted from a logging subsystem with a light
>> syntax.
>>
>
> I noticed this was recently checked into Phobos. What's its status? Is
> it experimental? Is it for inclusion in the upcoming (2.053) release? Is
> it for 2.054 (the next release after)?

Ouch. Pushing to Phobos is a mistake, I meant to only push it to my own 
fork of Phobos. I wouldn't dream of pushing a new module without going 
through the review process, and even less so since there's a competing 
proposal.

How do I undo that push?


Thanks,

Andrei