Resolution of core.time.Duration...

Sean Kelly sean at invisibleduck.org
Tue May 17 12:34:02 PDT 2011


On May 17, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> 
> I very much support the idea of deprecating all of the functions in druntime 
> and phobos which take naked time values. And then if a function that sleeps at 
> nanosecond resolution is considered to be of real value (which I question), 
> then we can add that as something like nanoSleep.

That was the plan.  I just wanted a few releases with the new Duration routines before deprecating the old ones.  Now sounds like a good time.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list