Resolution of core.time.Duration...
Sean Kelly
sean at invisibleduck.org
Tue May 17 12:34:02 PDT 2011
On May 17, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
> I very much support the idea of deprecating all of the functions in druntime
> and phobos which take naked time values. And then if a function that sleeps at
> nanosecond resolution is considered to be of real value (which I question),
> then we can add that as something like nanoSleep.
That was the plan. I just wanted a few releases with the new Duration routines before deprecating the old ones. Now sounds like a good time.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list