std.log available for viewing

[KennyTM~]

On May 31, 11 03:32, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> On 30/05/2011 20:08, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 05/30/2011 01:02 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>> On 5/30/2011 9:59 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
>>>> Walter, what do you think about adding __MODULE__ to the language? It
>>>> will work similar to __FILE__ and __LINE__ but instead get replaced by
>>>> the name of the module. This would be really useful for std.log's
>>>> verbosity filtering feature.
>>>
>>> I don't know. I know I am leery of just adding more and more stuff like
>>> this.
>>
>> Gnu's and subsequently C++0x's experience with __FUNCTION__ and
>> __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ has shown that the effects are beneficial.
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>
> Pull request #75 adds __traits(moduleOf) which allows you to get the
> module/package of a given symbol - I figure adding a trait is better
> than adding more ugly __FOOBAR__ nonsense (not that __traits() is the
> nicest syntax of course ;)).
>

The advantage of __NONSENSE__ is that, by convention, the token will be 
evaluated at instantiation site instead of definition site in a 
parameter default:

     template T(alias modName=__MODULE__) {
        ...

how would __traits(moduleOf, ...) deal with this?