BitBucket Offers Git Support

[Kagamin]

> > The merge itself can be a commit (if you use git merge instead of git 
> > pull), but there is no reason to eliminate the *entire* history when 
> > pulling in a branch.
> 
> Isn't the merge commit connected with the branch it was merged from? So if you want history of the branch, it's still there, it's just not main's history.

An example from Fossil:
20 recent commits: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline
20 recent commits in trunk: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?r=trunk