BitBucket Offers Git Support

[Alex Rønne Petersen]

On 03-11-2011 15:06, Kagamin wrote:
>>> Do I understand it right, that "sacred history problem" is a problem only for git due to how it implements merges?
>>>
>>> Also if you can always fast forward the main branch, does it mean the project is small, i.e. ~1 man is working on it?
>>
>> No, Git is probably the DVCS with *least* sacred history (read: nothing
>> is sacred).
>
> I meant, sacred history would be a problem only in git and is not a problem for other DVCSes where merges are done properly.

It's not just related to merges. With sacred history, you lose the 
ability to rebase, too.

- Alex