checkedTo
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Thu Nov 3 08:54:14 PDT 2011
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 13:38:44 Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> I think this could be integrated into "to" template without need for
> extra symbols.
> There are tons of optimization opportunities like this, that are
> currently not being utilized.
> If the result won't change, then the release version should drop safety
> checks.
And how would std.conv.to know that the result won't change? It k
nows nothing about the variable it's being passed, and that variable could
depend on user input or what's in a file or some other value which is runtime-
dependent.
I don't believe that anything in Phobos changes behavior based on -debug
(there are a few places where -debug=something results in a module printing
extra stuff for unittests - e.g. -debug=string for std.string - but not for -
debug), and -debug is really meant for debugging purposes, not for enabling or
disabling checks. That's for -release, which, for better or worse, you can't
actually check for in code. So, really, there is no way to have -release affect
any code in Phobos beyond what it does to the language in general (remove
assertions and remove array bounds checking in @system code), even if we
wanted it to, which is debatable.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list