How about a 100% CTFE?

[Martin Nowak]

On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:42:17 +0100, Trass3r <un at known.com> wrote:

>>>> version(ARM)
>>>> {
>>>> immutable X = armSpecificCode(); // you want to run this on an X86???
>>>> }
>>>>
>>> I've always thought that it would be worthwhile to experiment with
>>> LLVM's JIT engine here.
>>> But as has been said quite some care will be necessary for cross
>>> compilation.
>>> Allowing arbitrary non-pure functions would cause lots troubles.
>>
>> Yeah, I think JIT for CTFE would be *very* interesting. But mainly for  
>> reasons of speed rather than functionality.
>
> How would JIT work in the above case?

You would need to do JIT a target agnostic IR.