Type Qualifiers and Wild Cards

[Gor Gyolchanyan]

> Well use of auto can be ambiguous here I think.

I'm not sure, frankly. We should consult with Walter and co. because
they have a better idea about syntax readability.

> What about auto const ref ?

That will force you to have both auto const and auto ref at the same time.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 5:48 PM, deadalnix <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 08/11/2011 14:36, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit :
>>
>> I agree with _inout_ being a bad choice.
>> I'd rather use something involving _auto_, because this kind of use of
>> _auto_ is already employed in _auto ref_ parameters and is visually
>> unambiguous.
>> Probably _auto const_ would do the trick.
>>
>> The actual _inout_ keyword could be flagged as deprecated and removed
>> during the next breaking change in D (along with all other wonderful
>> breaking changes that were proposed).
>>
>
> Well use of auto can be ambiguous here I think.
>
> What about auto const ref ?
>