Bartosz about Chapel

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Timon Gehr" <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote in message 
news:j9oorj$obn$1 at digitalmars.com...
> On 11/13/2011 03:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>> And then, there's also complexities that are for the better. For example,
>> C++ AFAIK doesn't have IFTI. IFTI *is* an additional set of
>> rules/complexities *in the language*, but they're complexities that make 
>> the
>> language easier to use. SImilar thing with the implicit conversion rules 
>> for
>> primitive types: The rules for that are somewhat complicated, but they
>> usually make using the language easier and safer.
>>
>>
>
> C++ allows instantiating function templates without explicitly giving the 
> type parameters. Or what exactly do you think C++ does not have?
>

Hmm, I guess my C++ is just really rusty.