Deimos: Consistent structure?
Martin Nowak
dawg at dawgfoto.de
Mon Nov 21 10:51:50 PST 2011
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:27:42 +0100, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:
> On 2011-11-21 17:58, Dejan Lekic wrote:
>> On a second thought... Why would that be a problem? Even if hundreds of
>> packages are inside $HOME/include/d/deimos ??? The
>> -I$HOME/include/d/deimos
>> will just inform compiler where to look for modules. Is the "-I" flag
>> really
>> such an overhead? o.O
>
> No, I don't think it's any overhead. But I want this to be handled by a
> package manager. I want a file that says: "this project depends on these
> libraries". Then it's up to the package manager to install and make them
> available for the compiler.
>
That's the decision to be made. I'd personally prefer a library/package
approach for
deimos as such. At best import deimos.ncurses or import deimos.zeromq
would be everything
thats needed.
OTOH the D-Programming-Deimos is already suggesting to rather use a
package per binding approach
and if people wanted to distribute additional files it'd be the only
sensible choice.
Still I think this will loose some consistency.
By the way, how have you settled to request for adding a repository?
martin
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list