boost crowd.

[so]

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:40:06 +0200, Alexey Veselovsky  
<alexey.veselovsky at gmail.com> wrote:

> Now, let's try this on D:
>
> // Implementation
> module test;
>
> public {
>     void foo() {foo_helper();}
>
>     struct Boo
>     {
>     public:
>         void boo() {S ss; foo_helper();}
>     private:
>         struct S {};
>     }
> }
>
> private {
>     struct HelperStruct {};
>     void foo_helper() {HelperStruct s;}
> }
>
> // Specification (generated by dmd -H test.d -c) -- test.di file
> // D import file generated from 'test.d'
> module test;
> public
> {
>     void foo() {foo_helper();}
>
>     struct Boo
>     {
>         public
>         {
>             void boo() {S ss; foo_helper();}
>             private struct S{}
>         }
>     }
> }
>
> private
> {
>     struct HelperStruct{}
>     void foo_helper(){HelperStruct s;}
> }
>
> Usage:
> import test;
>
> void main() {
>     foo();          // ok
>     Boo b;          // ok
>     b.boo();        // ok
>     Boo.S ss;       // ok (wtf?)
>     HelperStruct s; // ok (wtf?!)
> }

You are right, i can't see anything that requires "not one" of those  
private stuff to be exposed.
This has to be a bug.