boost crowd.

Timon Gehr timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Mon Nov 28 09:26:23 PST 2011


On 11/28/2011 09:01 AM, so wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:44:23 +0200, Walter Bright
> <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/2011 4:44 PM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote:
>>> "D has a true module system that supports separate compilation and
>>> generates and uses module summaries (highbrowspeak for "header files")
>>> automatically from source, so you don't need to worry about
>>> maintaining redundant files separately, unless you really wish to, in
>>> which case you can. Yep, that stops that nag right in mid-sentence."
>>>
>>> But it is not true...
>>
>> How is it not true?
>
> I don't know if .di generation from .d or .h is any good or bad,
> but the comparison of auto-generated .di files to hand crafted .h files
> doesn't make sense.

Nobody stops you from hand crafting *.di files.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list