wxC & wxD

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2011-11-29 07:37, Gour wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:55:10 +0100
> Anders F Björklund<afb at algonet.se>  wrote:
>
>> I'm no fan of either, and prefer plain import modules and libs over
>> function pointers and complex tools.
>
> Well, my belief is that tools can help when maintaining bindings, iow.
> when one has to keep the API up-to-date.
>
> Of course, my experience was with c2hs (Haskell) where it was easy to
> notice change in the upstream's API.
>
> However, we'll try with SWIG.
>
>> But I guess that was obvious.
>
> It is.
>
>> Well, I believe you had the officially supported DWT
>
> I'm not so sure DWT is either officially supported or in the same league
> as other toolkits. World of SWT is not thrilling...

DWT is not officially supported. A couple of years ago Walter announced 
that DWT was going to be the official GUI library for D but that was one 
of the previous attempts to port SWT to D. When that happened the 
development of DWT stopped. I guess it was just bad timing but since 
that Walter has been very reluctant in doing something similar again.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg