wxC & wxD

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Mon Nov 28 23:47:01 PST 2011


On 2011-11-29 07:37, Gour wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:55:10 +0100
> Anders F Björklund<afb at algonet.se>  wrote:
>
>> I'm no fan of either, and prefer plain import modules and libs over
>> function pointers and complex tools.
>
> Well, my belief is that tools can help when maintaining bindings, iow.
> when one has to keep the API up-to-date.
>
> Of course, my experience was with c2hs (Haskell) where it was easy to
> notice change in the upstream's API.
>
> However, we'll try with SWIG.
>
>> But I guess that was obvious.
>
> It is.
>
>> Well, I believe you had the officially supported DWT
>
> I'm not so sure DWT is either officially supported or in the same league
> as other toolkits. World of SWT is not thrilling...

BTW, I don't understand what people has against DWT/SWT. In my 
experience it's the toolkit that offers best native look and feeling. 
Note that I have no experience with wx but the screenshots on the site 
looks really bad.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list