wxC & wxD

Anders F Björklund afb at algonet.se
Tue Nov 29 00:09:15 PST 2011


Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> I'm not so sure DWT is either officially supported or in the same league
>> as other toolkits. World of SWT is not thrilling...
>
> BTW, I don't understand what people has against DWT/SWT. In my
> experience it's the toolkit that offers best native look and feeling.

One advantage of DWT is/was that it linked directly with the system.
With wxWidgets (in wxD), there is the C++ framework layer inbetween.

But other than that, the two should be rather similar in look/feel ?
At least when compared to GTK+ or Qt, using their own custom widgets.

> Note that I have no experience with wx but the screenshots on the site
> looks really bad.

What site is that ? Is it one of these:

http://www.wxwidgets.org/about/screensh.htm

http://wxd.sourceforge.net/screenshot.html

http://wxd.sourceforge.net/#screenshots

It's not supposed to look much different, from other native apps.
The easiest way to see is trying the wxWidgets binaries yourself:

http://wxd.sourceforge.net/#demo

--anders


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list