wxC & wxD
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Tue Nov 29 04:43:53 PST 2011
On 2011-11-29 09:16, Marco Leise wrote:
> Am 29.11.2011, 08:47 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com>:
>
>> Note that I have no experience with wx but the screenshots on the site
>> looks really bad.
>
> Take a look at Code::Blocks for an example. I think it is one of the
> most sophisticated applications written with wxWidgets. I used to have
> trouble with the XML GUI definitions though. Somehow they took ages for
> me to load and generate the UI on Linux, but not on Windows. So I am
> biased slightly against wx with XML or XRC or what they are called.
I'll have a look at Code::Blocks.
> The images to the right http://eclipse.org/swt/ remind me of some
> discussion we had here. Anyway I'm fine with SWT, too and used gtkD
> previously. I think it looks good and is small by itself, relying mostly
> on functionality from the Java library where C++ libraries like QT tend
> to build up a large general purpose code base.
I know these images are not the best but at least they look better than
wxWidget's.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list