wxC & wxD

[Gour]

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:28:56 +0100
Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:

> But since DWT is a port of SWT (completely written in D) I think it's 
> fair to compare SWT/DWT to gtk, qt and wxwidgets.

I tend to agreei, but wonder how much of the binding process can be
automated or it could be done by hand only?

> As far as I know DWT is the only toolkit that does not require any 
> external dependencies (except the functions provided by the OS).

That's strong point...Maybe I should, at least, try to compile it and
check how it looks...


Sincerely,
Gour


-- 
In this endeavor there is no loss or diminution, 
and a little advancement on this path can protect 
one from the most dangerous type of fear.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20111129/2fc78f25/attachment.pgp>