boost crowd.

Kagamin spam at here.lot
Tue Nov 29 10:14:08 PST 2011


Paulo Pinto Wrote:

> Kagamin Wrote:
> 
> > bearophile Wrote:
> > 
> > > And this is positive because?
> > 
> > You say it as if it's negative.
> 
> 
> For me it is negative as what I understood from this discussion is that contrary to what is described in TDPL, D modules are not ready to prime time.
> 
> At least at the level Modula-2(3), Ada, Delphi, .Net, among others, offer modules.

And what .net modules provide you that D modules don't? Putting aside that I don't remember anything like D modules in .net. .Net has namespaces, which I prefer more, yes.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list