Names with trailing question mark

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2011-10-04 12:12, Christophe wrote:
>
> I don't really like this idea. D has limitations to accepted symbol that
> are strict, but handy in many cases. Accepting strange character in a
> method name can lead to parsing ambiguities and I like the way D enforce
> non-ambiguous code. I understand why we can think that the question mark
> is nicer than an auxilliary in this case, but where to draw the line?
> The question mark already lead to a (small) parsing ambiguity.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. If we allow "name?" should we allow 
"name!" as well (as Ruby does). Is there anything else we should allow? 
Allow everything?

I was thinking something like that.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg