std.getopt suggestion

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Christophe" <travert at phare.normalesup.org> wrote in message 
news:j6ho92$gtr$1 at digitalmars.com...
>
> Well, too much parametrization is wrong. But the posix way has to be
> supported, and it includes "-o output" (which is much more helpful than
> -ooutput for readability and for auto-completion in the shell).
>

Both of those always seemed goofy to me. "-o=output" and "-o:output" are the 
only ones that ever made much sense to me. (FWIW)