std.getopt suggestion

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at
Wed Oct 5 15:36:50 PDT 2011

On 10/05/11 16:37, kennytm wrote:
> I don't buy this. You make it sounds like the community cannot contribute
> with more than 1 focus concurrently. The fact is that, the GCC integration,
> making wrappers of C library and switching to non-global in std.getopt are
> done in parallel by different subgroup of interests. I doubt if GDC will be
> locked out of GCC or people will stop writing D wrappers just because 3
> globals are proposed to be removed.

I used to think the same, but unfortunately it is a fact of life that we 
don't have as much parallelism as we should.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list