typeof()

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2011-10-21 09:35, Marco Leise wrote:
> Am 21.10.2011, 09:20 Uhr, schrieb Gor Gyolchanyan
> <gor.f.gyolchanyan at gmail.com>:
>
>> Actually, the best idea would be to enable full reflection (much more
>> complete, then what we have now) by default and allow to remove it on
>> demand.
>> Just like the methods being virtual by default, but with ability to
>> make them final.
>
> As far as I know that is just what the programmer sees. If the compiler
> can verify that the method doesn't need to be virtual it will make it
> static by default. In terms of RTTI it would resemble to "add RTTI to a
> type only when we cannot be sure it isn't needed".

Currently DMD doesn't do any devirtualization IIRC but I get your point.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg