nospam at nospam.com
Sun Oct 23 05:26:34 PDT 2011
On 23.10.2011 00:28, Sean Kelly wrote:
> It's annoying as it means a pass through the documentation team for distributed software, but whatever. At least it's usable. Personally, my favorite is the Boost license, and I'm just about to the point where I don't even care about source code attribution for my own work.
Yes. I don't see why it's necessary at all. To take somebody's code and
pretend that you wrote it, is plagiarism. You don't need a license to
tell you that.
> On Oct 22, 2011, at 2:51 PM, "Adam D. Ruppe"<destructionator at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Even the two clause BSD annoys me because of this:
>> "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>> documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution."
>> It strikes me as empty vanity.
More information about the Digitalmars-d