syntax definition language

[Gor Gyolchanyan]

Anyway, I'm writing a general-purpose parser base, so i won't need it for now.
And when i do, I'd like to have a correct grammar definition, so i can
feed it to my parser.
Who should i ask to ensure it's correctness?

Once I'm done, I'll send a pull request for something around
"etc.dcfe" for "D compiler front end".
It won't be perfect, of course, but it will be a start, from which the
front-end would be gradually developed.
I wanna at least have an AST parser by the time i make the pull request.

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 02:16 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, i know about EBNF, but it uses completely different syntax.
>> I'm really excited about having a standard D compiler front-end as a
>> library solution, so i though it would be best to parse the syntax
>> from the syntax definition of dpl.org
>>
>
> That can currently not be done. The syntax specification on dpl.org is out
> of date and contains many errors and inaccuracies. (at least it was that way
> the last time I checked)
>