syntax definition language

[Timon Gehr]

On 10/23/2011 07:19 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:10:08 +0200, Gor Gyolchanyan
> <gor.f.gyolchanyan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Anyway, I'm writing a general-purpose parser base, so i won't need it
>> for now.
>> And when i do, I'd like to have a correct grammar definition, so i can
>> feed it to my parser.
>> Who should i ask to ensure it's correctness?
>>
>> Once I'm done, I'll send a pull request for something around
>> "etc.dcfe" for "D compiler front end".
>> It won't be perfect, of course, but it will be a start, from which the
>> front-end would be gradually developed.
>> I wanna at least have an AST parser by the time i make the pull request.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:
>>> On 10/23/2011 02:16 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, i know about EBNF, but it uses completely different syntax.
>>>> I'm really excited about having a standard D compiler front-end as a
>>>> library solution, so i though it would be best to parse the syntax
>>>> from the syntax definition of dpl.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> That can currently not be done. The syntax specification on dpl.org
>>> is out
>>> of date and contains many errors and inaccuracies. (at least it was
>>> that way
>>> the last time I checked)
>>>
>
> I've written a fast and pretty complete D lexer
> (https://gist.github.com/1262321).
>
> It is based on a generic lexer component which will generate efficient
> matching
> functions at compile time (https://gist.github.com/1255439).
>
> I think there are still some compiler bugs to be sorted out so you won't
> be able to compile
> it out of the box.
>
> martin


4| import lexer; // where is this file?